I don't really mind whether or not you use the Alternatives class. I
think Alberto is a better person to discuss this with.
FFE-wise, approved. It is zero risk for non-OMAP4 systems.
Implementation wise, I have no way to test this, but I assume you did
already. I just wonder if it is sufficient to check /proc/cpuinfo for
this? Do all omap4 systems use the same graphics chipset and thus this
driver?
** Project changed: jockey => jockey (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to jockey in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978563
Title:
FFe: jockey support for pvr-omap4 (Pandaboard)
Status in “jockey” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
PowerVR SGX OpenGL ES driver for Pandaboard is now available at
Precise, but still lacks support for jockey.
Having the support will improve the user experience because the user
will be able to install the proprietary OpenGL ES 2.0 driver by just
using jockey's gtk interface.
This will enable a normal user to activate the Unity 3D experience
using the OpenGL ES2.0 support by just following the same procedure
already available for other boards like Nvidia and ATI.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/978563/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
