On 2021-01-28 04:58, Daniel van Vugt wrote: > Any bug reported through the ideal means of 'ubuntu-bug' or from > errors.ubuntu.com will get the tags automatically.
Ah, ok. > As for people who don't like the process, that's OK. I find about one > in 400 bugs receive a complaint from affected persons. And one in 400 > is pretty low so I consider the procedure a success. Not sure that's the most adequate way to measure the success of the current workflow. The ultimate purpose of the bug tracker is to improve the quality of the software we make available. The method I outlined would probably result in fewer open bugs, but they would be closed more transparently, and which bugs would stay and which ones would be closed would be determined based on importance and thus less randomly. There may well be aspects that I miss, but how about giving my idea a thought? :) @Rulon: Please bear with us for using your bug report for discussing a much more wide topic than the specific issue you reported. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913218 Title: Obscure shortcut selector behaviour To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1913218/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
