>It's not useful on a normal system since it's for debugging Depends on point of view. :) *As long as* everything is still working fine, there is no need for that tool. But once evince goes all wonky with a certain PDF, it's the best tool to use and NOT (as most users do) put the entire blame on evince itself. But evince is merely the "executive power", while highly dependent on the API it accesses under the hood.
>Do you know if what binary fedora includes the binary? Sure, but you will get the information only because you've explicitly asked for it. :) So here goes... Originally, it was in poppler-utils, cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872338 Later, Marek moved it to its own subpackage 'poppler-demos'. Version 0.40 is now in the wild out there: http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1912994 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #872338 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872338 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537895 Title: Please include poppler-glib-demo tool in standard package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/1537895/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
