I think you are entirely missing the point. Read the topic of the bug. The idea is to have a _Human_ variant.
This means a very restricted set of design guidelines (albeit inferred as opposed to well documented) in order to fit in. The sources are provided and they are SVG which means that the antialiasing isn't really an issue at all as it is a product of a relatively good algorithm. There are people of two large general mindsets -- A) twiddle the heck out of something that is completely irrelevant to the average user or B) get the 'big picture' in place. In my eyes, the latter is more important than the former. Many people spend long hours twiddling the heck out of their work and fail to realize that ultimately, the average end user (lets propose 21-36) could care less about the effort the individual has exerted as it simply isn't a factor. Get the broad strokes down, then polish later. To that end, there is enough foundation building material within this thread to at _least_ alleviate the bug and work towards a more consistent presentation. The second 10 minute icon was an attempt to address what Etienne highlighted as a thematic issue. Icons that are visible for less than 0.5% of your viewing day should probably be evaluated accordingly. -- "desktop-effects" human variant would be nice https://launchpad.net/bugs/80946 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
