This is pretty serious.  The gdm.conf is broken in two major ways after
installing gdm-2.20.  It depends on:

a) /etc/X11/default-display-manager
and
b) 'gdm-binary'

... neither of which existed.

Since I have an intel chipset (and the "bulletproof"
/etc/init/failsafe-x.conf which launches /etc/gdm/failsafeXServer which
launches X with /etc/X11/xorg.conf.failsafe that defaults to "vesa,") I
get a blank screen and no VT tty1-tty6s.  I wasted a day rebooting into
single-user mode, futzing with init/rc?.d scripts, and finally logging
in blindly to a blank terminal in order to set up networking so I could
discover/regret this upstart nonsense.  All just to get X to work again
because of this broken gdm-2.20 package's gdm.conf (also,
/etc/X11/gdm.conf was broken, with refs to /usr/bin/X11R6).

The old gdm is the only one we can reasonably configure/theme (some
6,000 users have checked out:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1333683) without gnome-
appearance-properties from gnome-control-center which requires 120mb if
one only has XFCE, or this kind hack: https://launchpad.net/gdm2setup
which failed to work for me.  Downgrading gdm was an obvious choice and
nowhere did I read it was "not recommended."  Obviously if I'd known how
broken this package was I would have simply given up on themes
altogether, and accepted the newer, uglier, gdm.

-- 
downgrade to gdm-2.20 leaves stale /etc/init/gdm.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498732
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Reply via email to