It isn't a matter of 'coding new visualizations'--its a matter of making totem-gstreamer have the same ones as totem-xine. They are mostly the same codebase, why can't they have the same visualizations?
The totem-gstreamer visualizations are brokenand I'll bet the fix isn't huge. I've filed bugs upstream and not rejected them here--they just wait. I don't think its good to reject bugs without putting them into specs first. Anyway, I do see other 'wishlist' bugs, why does mine have to be rejected? Finally, I do believe this is closer to a bug than a feature. But if you call it a feature you can reject it and forget about it and that isn't really good. -- Visualization options are worse than totem-xine https://launchpad.net/bugs/43319 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
