They are "so strict" because they can use only one name for their software, and why should them call it "Window Media Player"? It's a free player and has nothing to do with Window, there is no reason to acknowledge than only Microsoft is authorized to do a media player. If everybody does that the websites are never going to be fixed
-- [dapper] playable movies can't be played if inside a web page! https://launchpad.net/bugs/38584 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
