Looking at the upstream "progress" doesn't really reassure me. There was a patch in April, a few developers commented on it middle of May. Isn't this a case where we just have to fix it in Ubuntu as soon as possible, and rather reharmonize with upstream whenever they will reach consensus on their ideal fix? Changing this behaviour from one release to another and refer to it as "design decision" would be quite arrogant towards normal users using Ubuntu for real work.
The upstream gio-access-time.diff patch applies on Hardy glib2.0. I'll try it out on my PPA. -- Nautilus not preserving timestamps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
