John,

 

I think the point Dave is making is:

 

They did notify all clients individually about the availability of the new
version, urging them to act immediately!

However, when they managed to release an incomplete install, they did NOT
send out a second notice to that exact same group to warn those who were
trusting enough to follow their initial urging to upgrade that they better
download a second time.

 

In fact, if their customer portal has a "last login" field in their
database, then they could have identified anyone who had accessed their
customer portal that day and even restricted the follow-up warning to that
group.

 

I feel Dave's pain: I was lucky that I didn't have time earlier. Otherwise I
could have been in the same boat. And by the time the installation failed -
and NO mail was being delivered anymore, with customers up in arms about it
- my last concern would have been catching up on the chatter on mailing
lists.

 

Best Regards,

Andy

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(lists)
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: "DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS
SCANNING UPDATE"

 

The upgrade that came out today, 4.3.46, was specifically and pointedly only
to correct a problem with the built-in AVG scanner that was created by a
change AVG recently made.

 

John T

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Doherty
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: "DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS
SCANNING UPDATE"

 

I did so, and the upgrade went fine this time.

 

So why did they restrict the distibution of the mod notice to the AV list
when they sent individual emails to notify of the initial upgrade?

 

This is more than annoying...

 

-d



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to