"if you are bad then you are really bad" Not really, my goal is doing some analysis on TESTA (see why high weight messages did not fail testA) , using an action on Filter2 (copy or route), not to add weight
----- Original Message ----- From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 5:23 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] testfailed in filters > > the manual says that MINWEIGHTTOFAIL is the total weight attributed by the > > filter > > I need the weight ON STARTING the filter > > OOPS, your right. Forgot that. > > > What I want, is a test of messages that did NOT fail TestA, but do have a > > TOTAL weight > 10 > > To do what, run the filter or cause a failure? If it is to cause a test > failure, that is then like saying "if you are bad then you are really bad" > it kind of goes against the premise of what the foundation of the weighting > system is. > > John T > eServices For You > > "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood." > Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
