Hey guys, here is another option to consider, using ClamAV http://www.msrbl.com/site/msrblimagesdownload
David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam Let me jump in here for a moment. Chris, CommTouch has a very high false positive rate (around 2% based on what I saw, but those aren't my numbers), and for those of us with very tight systems (we achieve over 99.85% block rates on all but a few domains, based on manual review and not assumptions), and have no real issues with image spam because we have sufficient filtering set up to tag this stuff reliably, adding CommTouch would not be a positive for our system. I and most others in my position do use Sniffer however, and it tags more spam and has fewer false positives than what some tests have shown with CommTouch. Custom filters and even ClamAV can stop this stuff with a lot of ease. Pre-scanning gateways with greylisting and tarpitting decimate most zombies with as near to a 100% accuracy rate as you can get. I haven't had an image spam reported to me in months. CommTouch is probably a fine solution for those that have no interest in administrating a system and who don't care much about the false positives on bulk mail. For those of us that generate revenue directly from E-mail services, we not only don't have the option to use it, but we would also be wise to weight it low if we did, especially since the FP issues between various tests do compound and it is difficult to manage FP's...much more difficult than it is to manage spam blocking. Scott Fisher posted his method for adding points to image spam, and if implemented properly, this is very effective on a plain vanilla Declude install and won't have a large false positive issue. So if you want an opinion from someone that has been dealing with this for years and has found success, the proper answer to image spam is to use a prescanning gateway with selective greylisting and tarpitting, and filter for the technical heuristics associated with image spam using the tools available within Declude, and add Sniffer because it is the best content scanning tool available. You guys should have made a deal with Pete instead of CommTouch. Sniffer blows it out of the water and he has no licensing restrictions. IMO of course. Matt chris wrote: The option is there, lets not kid ourselves, for you issue is cost, I can understand that.. Chris ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam Chris, you need to learn what your company is doing. As a hosting service provider, I am specifically prevented from using CommTouch unless I want to spend several thousand dollars using the Declude gateway product. $195 is quite acceptable if I was allowed to pay it. Sorry to burst your bubble but I am not being allowed the option to implement or not. John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chris Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:11 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam A one time cost of 195.00 is not a large portion of your revenue and it is your option to not implement this or not. Chris ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:57 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam ...and give a large part of our revenue to Commtouch? Provide a feasible way to justify the additional costs for our existing customers and service contracts! THEN we could talk about Commtouch. BTW: even if it's hard work to maintain a reliable spam filter it's not an impossible thing. years of contribution from our own researches, creation of text filters, publication of new spam and filter signs, developement of - in declude long time and still missing - additional external tests allowed and still allows us to have reliable filters and no image spam in my inbox. The question is why Declude has become a competitor of our work from what it was some years ago: an excellent tool for us admins to do our own hard work. Looking at your pricing I can see anywhere limitations based on users. What if I have a single gatewayed domain? Markus ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chris Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam Guys, Commtouch hasn't missed any, stop making things hard on yourselves... Chris ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam Sorbs-DUL and NJABL Dynablock look to be the best. Although they miss lots. 5-10's has been discontinued. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Marchette <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3:53 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam Thanks all for the various suggestions. Agreed- combo is the way to use that test, for sure. A bit OT, but what is the popular and accurate DUL database these days? How accurate is fiveten at DUL lookups? ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam I combo the graphics hit (jpg, gif or png) with: 1. bad DNS - None or timeout 2. bad language (eastern European iso-8859-2) or Cyrillic (koi8-r or iso-8859-5), etc 3. cmdspace 4. good DUL IP lists/tests 5. having forged your local domain. I still get 5-10 a day. It is a pain. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Marchette <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:08 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] picture spam Has anyone figured out a reasonable way to use Declude to minimize picture spam? Sniffer is missing most. They are sent from fresh hosts, so RBL's don't catch them, and there is no target, so INVuribl misses them as well. Associates of ours are using Barracuda to stop most successfully, so it is at least possible. Ideas are welcomed. Dave --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
