IMO you should never let a single test hold a messages. The question is: what is a single test? Or Is invURIBL a single test?
invURIBL does multiple checks insinde and so it's practicaly a set of URIBL-based tests that could add some points to the weighting system. I would consider, to not block on invURIBL but to ensure that invURIBL has a high weight so that it will block in combination with other tests. Markus > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 5:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] INV-URIBL Scoring? > > > Hi Guys, > > > Considering that INV-URIBL looks at just the links contained > in known spam, is it safe to set the weight on this test so > high that this single test would trigger a hold or delete weight? > > Right now I have it set to score fairly low, and it adds to > the total score, but would not cause a hold without other > tests adding to the weight. > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
