Hi,
We are seeing this on our system too. Some emails are not being
processed by Declude.
Kevin
At 08:53 AM 4/25/2006, you wrote:
I'm also interested in this problem. I have left our system on IMail 8.15
and Declude 1.82 because of this. It doesn't seem to happen on this version.
I would really like to find a workaround so I can upgrade.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Olden
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Emails not be scanned by Declude
These types have become an increasing menace to our system also. It does
fail some of our Declude tests but it does not get scanned by Spamchk
which would have put them over the hold limit.
Has anyone come up with an alternative test for this? We've just
recently switched over to the Pro version of Declude so I'm not familiar
with filters yet.
On a side note, we subject tag all messages over the hold level with
their spam score. When using Spam Review, there are a bunch of messages
that were held but the subject is listed as one of the header fields.
Usually the ones that are from Yahoo or Hotmail and have
"To:MIME-Version..." or "To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version..." in the Spam
Review Subject column are legitimate message (false positives) while the
ones that have "X-complaints-To::Content-Transfer-Encoding;" are all spam.
All other Spam Review columns are correct. Anyone have a test/remedy for
this?
John Olden
Systems Administrator
Champaign Park District
Michael Thomas - Mathbox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You might want to look at the entire typical file, in Notepad or Dump it
> contents as hex values. I have noticed a similar percentage of spam that
has
> no carriage returns. Which means that the Declude headers get added to the
> end of the file, rather than after the headers. If you also happen to run
> invURIBL, you will note that the currently available version does not
parse
> the message, apparently because at most there is only one "line" in the
> message. Don't know if this is your issue, but thought I would point it
out
> as a possiblity. If that is the case, it was fairly simple to write a test
> for it.
>
> Mike
>
>
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
__________ NOD32 1.1507 (20060425) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
