I have repeatedly switch back and forth between the two version (V9 and V11)
I assure that I have changed nothing else and that cpu usage is higher on the V11 I watch V9 cpu usage I go from V9 to V11 and cpu usage increases Back to V9: it goes down Back to V11 it goes up. How else does one state this problem? It would make a lot of sense if Declude were to say that they have made a change in the code that would cause this, but that is not the case. Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet & Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2 519-741-1222 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 4:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > Andy, don't be scared I can hold you hand :) > > >> How do I explain the apparent inconsistency where users > report that > >> the > CPU consumption is considerable higher than in the prior version? > > First we need to confirm that it is decludeproc that has > increased in CPU usage. So far I have not seen any real > statistics for this other than what has been posted on the > boards. But I am certainly trying to validate this information. > > >> How can the various "process" settings make any difference > - at worst > >> it > should spike quickly and then be idle? > > Why do you think it should spike and then become idle ? > > >> What is spending all this other CPU time on? Looping, looking for > directory content? > > Perhaps an incorrect assumption, Declude actually uses less > CPU, between 3% and 20% on average. > > David B > www.declude.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > Okay, I'm watching these discussions - as I'm still truly > scared of upgrading Declude. > > I just can't figure out the logic behind all the CPU > consumption and why certain process parameters are suspected > to have detrimental effects. > > > Please verify my thinking: > > A machine that needs to process a given amount of mail will > require a certain number of instructions, which are reflected > in the total CPU usage. > If several messages come in almost simultaneously, then I can > either process them right away using parallel processes, > causing a short spike in CPU use - or I can process them one > by one, using up the same CPU time over time and causing a > few seconds delay in mail delivery. > > Either way, the overall CPU consumption should be the same - > just distributed differently. > > > So - if the above is true, how do I explain the apparent > inconsistency where users report that the CPU consumption is > considerable higher than in the prior version? How can the > various "process" settings make any difference - at worst it > should spike quickly and then be idle? > > If the old Declude handled the amount of mail with moderate > CPU use and without causing noticeable delays in mail > delivery to the users - then I can't see how the same outcome > suddenly should require x times the CPU resources, no matter > how inefficient the process settings are? What is spending > all this other CPU time on? Looping, looking for directory content? > > > Best Regards > Andy Schmidt > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > Fax: +1 201 934-9206 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > GlobalWeb.net Webmaster > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > I changed the THREADS to 75 and CPU wnet down to about avg > 50%. I'll try > WAITFORMAIL in just a bit. > > I also noticed in my spool folder I have a new folder called > "s" that appeared with the time stamp of the new proc > install. There is nothing in it; just a blank folder. I deleted it. > > > Sincerely, > > Randy Armbrecht > Global Web Solutions, Inc. > 804-346-5300 x112 > 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112 > http://globalweb.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:39 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > Randy try changing > > WAITFORMAIL 1500 > > To > > WAITFORMAIL 500 > > See if that changes the delay. > > David B > www.declude.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > GlobalWeb.net Webmaster > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > We upgraded to 3.0.5.11 tonight - big difference in CPU in > that it's way down from the 3.0.5.5 - but proc folder will > accumulate approx 35-50 messages before it'll dump them to > the work folder. Do not see any problems so far except for > the second or two delay in this... > > We have in our declude.cfg: > THREADS 50 > WAITFORMAIL 1500 > WAITFORTHREADS 1000 > WAITBETWEENTHREADS 1 > > > > > Sincerely, > > Randy Armbrecht > Global Web Solutions, Inc. > 804-346-5300 x112 > 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112 > http://globalweb.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Harry Vanderzand > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: 'Technical Support' > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram imail 8.05 declude, sniffer & invurbl > > The issue is that without changing anything other than going > to 3.05.11 this occurs > > It appears that processing has changed > > If I could get some idea from Declude about this. > > Maybe I have to change my declude.cfg? > > It currently is > > threads 20 > waitformail 500 > waitforthreads 1500 > waitbetweenthreads 100 > > Harry Vanderzand > inTown Internet & Computer Services > 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2 > 519-741-1222 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter > > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:30 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > > > Interesting ... .11 is working for me better than any > previous version > > -- proc and work are quickly cleared. > > > > What process is jumping the CPU up so high? Decludeproc or the > > anti-virus > > scanner(s) or something else? How about some more info (CPU, RAM, > > declude.cfg contents, do you run AVAFTERJM?, that kind of thing.) > > > > John > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry > > Vanderzand > > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:10 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem > > > > When I switch from 3.05.9 to 3.05.11 CPU usage goes up considerably > > and mail gets processed much slower and starts to backlog. > > > > I have had to switch back to 3.05.9 > > > > Harry Vanderzand > > inTown Internet & Computer Services > > 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2 > > 519-741-1222 > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
