|
Gary, Sorry, this was my own incomplete read on your message headers. SmarterMail doesn't insert a Received header when you use Webmail, but I should have caught that. I'm with David about the potential cause of the issue. Looks like something is stealing the message, and that something is likely SmarterMail. It's too bad that SmarterMail can't work like IMail does with the queue/spool. Maybe in 3.0 it will, but I would think that people from Declude would need to show them the light if they haven't already figured that one out. Matt Gary Steiner wrote: What made you think I was on IMail? I'm using SmarterMail 2.6. The Declude version I'm running is 2.0.6 (I purchased the product in July 2005).AUTOWHITELIST is definitely not ON. Here's a little snippet from the log file: 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 Msg failed WEIGHT30 (Weight of 31 reaches or exceeds the limit of 30.). Action="" 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] actionsdata[ i ] = [26 Sep 2005] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] ACTION_HOLD - holddir [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] ACTION_HOLD - datafile [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.EML] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] ACTION_HOLD - recipfile [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.HDR] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] ACTION_HOLD - datahold [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005\39819112.EML] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] ACTION_HOLD - reciphold [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005\39819112.HDR] 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---> $1.56 per dose pmonkz qdvfg ouo 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 219.13.84.45 ID: A3FF561BF4 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 Tests failed [weight=31]: CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=WARN IPNOTINMX=WARN CBL=WARN MXRATE-BLOCK=WARN SORBS-DUHL=WARN SPAMBAG=WARN FIVETENSRC=WARN ROUTING=WARN WEIGHT6=WARN WEIGHT10=HOLD WEIGHT14=HOLD WEIGHT20=HOLD WEIGHT30=HOLD 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 Action(s) taken for [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] = IGNORE WARN HOLD [LAST ACTION="" 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Done Looping 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] RecipFile( C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.HDR ); 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] QUEUEFILE_SAVEFILE = newhdrfile = [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.HDR] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] QUEUEFILE_SAVEFILE = newemlfile = [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.EML] 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 Cumulative action(s) taken on this email = IGNORE WARN HOLD [LAST ACTION="" 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] AlterMessage 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Subject = [] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Warning = [X-RBL-Warning: NOLEGITCONTENT: No content unique to legitimate E-mail detected. X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX: X-RBL-Warning: CBL: "Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=219.13.84.45" X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-BLOCK: "http://www.mxrate.com/lookup/refused.asp?ipaddress=219.13.84.45" X-RBL-Warning: SORBS-DUHL: "Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?219.13.84.45" X-RBL-Warning: SPAMBAG: 45.84.13.219.blacklist.spambag.org. X-RBL-Warning: FIVETENSRC: 45.84.13.219.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam [2000010f]. X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT6: Weight of 31 reaches or exceeds the limit of 6. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [219.13.84.45] X-Declude-Spoolname: 39819112.EML X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 2.0.6 (http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm) for spam. X-Declude-Scan: Score [31] at 01:25:17 on 26 Sep 2005 X-Declude-Tests: NOLEGITCONTENT, IPNOTINMX, CBL, MXRATE-BLOCK, SORBS-DUHL, SPAMBAG, F 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Header = [] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Footer = [--- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] MoveFile in AlterMessage - datafile = [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.EML] TempFile = [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.EM$] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] CreateHoldFolder parameter [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005\39819112.EML] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Hold directory is [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Moving file to spam hold directory [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.EML][C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005\39819112.EML] 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 ERROR: Could not move spam to hold! Code: [2] Error String: [The system cannot find the file specified.] [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.EML] [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005\39819112.EML] 09/26/2005 01:25:17.022 39819112 [2408] Moving file to spam hold directory [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.HDR][C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005\39819112.HDR] 09/26/2005 01:25:17 39819112 ERROR: Could not move spam to hold! Code: [2] Error String: [The system cannot find the file specified.] [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\proc\39819112.EML] [C:\SMARTERMAIL\SPOOL\spam\26 Sep 2005\39819112.EML] -------- Original Message --------From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support Gary, If you want help resolving this from the list members, it would be best to post your Declude version and product levels, one such log snippet for a message, and also your global.cfg and the associated $default$.junkmail. I did note that you are using IMail 8.05, and I am on IMail 8.15 and have no such issues, though I am not using the HOLD action, but instead the COPYFILE action. There is a possibility that you have AUTOWHITELIST ON in your global.cfg, and you have users than have themselves or others on their own domain in their Webmail address books, and the effect of that would be to whitelist the message if it came from a spammer that forged the sender to match one of these entries. This is a common thing for people with AUTOWHITELIST ON to experience, though your description doesn't match exactly the circumstances here. Chances are that your issues can be solved with changing your configuration and it might well not be a bug. Matt Gary Steiner wrote: |
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude s... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Decl... Gary Steiner
- [Declude.JunkMail] Any fix released for the c... Mark Smith
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any fix released f... John T \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any fix releas... John T \(Lists\)
- [Declude.JunkMail] Other Problem... Robert Grosshandler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Other... Darin Cox
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] O... Robert Grosshandler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] O... Darin Cox
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] O... Robert Grosshandler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] O... Darin Cox
