Hi:
 
You have WHITELIST AUTH defined - but also defined that white lists should be BYPASSED, if a mail has a weight >= 12 and 4 recipients. Your message has a weight of 20 and 4 recipients, thus is bypassed the white list.
 
(Now - personally - I feel that "SMTP AUTH" should not be treated like a regular white list.  Indeed, I feel that SMTP AUTH should not be overwritten.)

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 04:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Should have been whitelisted

The following e-mail got tagged as spam, even though it was from an authenticated send.
 
First, the imail log:
 
20050518 115243 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [64.4.213.172] connect 184.122.4.102 port 2528 (this is a remote user)
20050518 115243 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [184.122.4.102] EHLO betazoid
20050518 115245 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) Authenticated [EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated as local.
20050518 115245 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [184.122.4.102] MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20050518 115245 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [184.122.4.102] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20050518 115245 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [184.122.4.102] RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20050518 115246 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [184.122.4.102] RCPT TO: <oooo@igive.com>
20050518 115246 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [184.122.4.102] RCPT TO: <nnnn@iGive.com>
20050518 115247 127.0.0.1       SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [184.122.4.102] f:\imaillogs\D72db5d54010e1dde.SMD 16506
 
 
Now, the declude log:
 
05/18/2005 11:52:55 Q72DB5D54010E1DDE NOT bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=25 (20) and at least 4 recipients (4).
05/18/2005 11:52:55 Q72DB5D54010E1DDE Bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=12 (20) and at least 4 recipients (
=====================================================

Reply via email to