My mistake.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: AOL Treats FL Emergency response as spam.

Uh, I understood it to be that some "recipients" were on AOL - not the sender!
 
It's also not AOLs fault, if some AOL customers have blocked the receipt because they are too lazy to unsubscribe.
 
And, AOL does have means to allow certain senders to be "white-listed".
 
I think it's more a matter of FL going to the press instead of going to someone who understands SMTP.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Fahey
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: AOL Treats FL Emergency response as spam.

You can't realistically blame AOL here. Anyone using an AOL account for this kind of application is making a serious error in judgement. Why aren't they partnering with FEMA or running their own server? The only reason I can imagine them using AOL is ... and this is a struggle ... for offsite protection.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Stillwell
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 9:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: AOL Treats FL Emergency response as spam.

Its OT, but its funny.. AOL rocks.
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to