|
Okay,
let me try it this way...
RFC
822 states:
3.1.2. STRUCTURE OF HEADER
FIELDS
Once a field has been unfolded, it may be viewed as being com- posed of a field-name followed by a colon (":"), followed by a field-body, and terminated by a carriage-return/line-feed. The field-name must be composed of printable ASCII characters (i.e., characters that have values between 33. and 126., decimal, except colon). The field-body may be composed of any ASCII characters, except CR or LF. (While CR and/or LF may be present in the actual text, they are removed by the action of unfolding the field.) My
reading of the RFC is, that 0x20 (32) is NOT permitted as a header field name!
Thus:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed Weight:
is NOT to be
interpreted as a valid header!
Best
Regards
|
Title: Message
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.... Andy Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v... Nick
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v... Frederick Samarelli
- [Declude.JunkMail] Still can't install ... S.J.Stanaitis
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Still can't ... S.J.Stanaitis
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Still can't ... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
