Fred,
The line that you commented out looked fine to me, so that is strange.
What concerns me is that the message is being processed twice by
Declude. I would hate to see this happen with other things as that is
a waste of resources. As long as we're still guessing and thinking out
loud, maybe 2.0.5 wasn't double-processing the E-mail and now 2.0.6 is,
and that might have uncovered a bug with the XINHEADER insertion that
may have existed before...or maybe a new %TESTSFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% bug.
I recall in a more recent version of IMail that the behavior in IMail
had changed and Scott had to code a fix into Declude so that it
wouldn't double process forwarded messages. Maybe that code is broken
or lost due to recent tweaking. I would imagine that over the years
there were a lot of small things
that Scott programmed into the product that resolved quirks with IMail
but could be overlooked or lost in recoding for new features and fixes.
Another very strange thing is that the following headers I don't
believe get added to an E-mail until it lands in an account, but they
appeared before the second set of Declude headers in the message:
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 411698213
I can't tell however if IMail inserted them after the first time
through or after the second time through. If they were added the first
time through that might be odd behavior that Declude wasn't expecting
to see...but then again it may be equally plausible that space aliens
have hijacked your server and are just having their laughs :)
I guess that's it for my speculation.
Matt
Frederick Samarelli wrote:
We have incoming email scanned by
Symantec Gateway Antivirus then have to sent to the imail server.
For some of my tests I bypassed the
Symantec server and the problem remained.
Only removing the line listed fixed
the problem.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:43 PM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6
Fred,
The example that you sent earlier was being processed twice and it was
passing through IMail to Symantec and back to IMail with some other
forwarding mechanism as well, and the headers were written 30 seconds
apart. I think that understanding what is happening there might be
beneficial to uncovering the issue at hand, and maybe there are steps
in that chain that are unnecessary or out of place.
I don't doubt that 2.0.6 might have introduced a bug that is reacting
to this condition, but the path the E-mail is taking doesn't seem
normal and that could be affecting it, and probably is why others
aren't reporting this. Knowing what is going on within your system
might also help Declude diagnose the issue better also.
Your config looks just fine, but the path the E-mail is taking looks
abnormal to me.
Matt
Frederick Samarelli wrote:
This is not the case.
I sent a test from my Yahoo
account to my imail account.
If I look at it in Imail it is
ok.
If I do the test again having a
forward in on my imail account to an AOL account the header info get
placed in the top of the BODY when I received it at my AOL account.
See below from the TEXT of the
BODY.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed Weight: SNIFFERZERO [0]
X-Spam-Time:12:53:55
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 0
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned & filtered by Declude [2.0.6] for
SPAM & virus
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SNIFFERZERO
X-Weight: 0
X-Mailfrom: samarelli.yahoo.com
X-Note: Sent from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from Reverse DNS: web51803.mail.yahoo.com
([206.190.38.234])
X-Hello: web51803.mail.yahoo.com
X-Note: Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-AOL-IP: 64.124.116.40
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:0:0:0:
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:0
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6
Fred,
It looks like two full sets of Declude's XINHEADER's, and something
caused a double line break in it. I am also having a problem
understanding the path that this E-mail took, and maybe that will give
you some clues. There is something forwarding the message and that
might partially explain why it has two sets of headers, but the double
line break shouldn't appear there.
Maybe you could explain the path that this took: 64.124.116.10
(IMail) -> SMTP32-FWD (Probably
also IMail) -> 64.124.116.40 (SMSSMTP, Symantec???) -> 64.124.116.30 (IMail again).
I am going to guess that it is possible that Declude is
getting confused based on the body being in a format similar to a
header where there is a word followed by a colon, and in the process,
it might be inserting the headers in the wrong location when it is
adding them the second time. Total guess there of course. I suspect
that the path is causing some form of double-processing, possibly the
Symantec SMSSMTP piece, and that if you could resolve that, the problem
might go away. Also note that the headers show a 30 second difference
between the headers, so it's going somewhere.
So to summarize, it looks like it's being double-processed due to some
mechanism involving SMSSMTP, and Declude is maybe parsing the message
incorrectly for where to insert the second set of headers, and if you
could get it to only process it once (remove forwarding/looping
possible issue), the symptom might go away. If so, Declude might also
want to look at the parsing code for where to insert the headers and
account for the condition in future releases as I'm sure that isn't
intentional.
Matt
Frederick Samarelli wrote:
See attached config.
The problem only started
after the update from 2.0.5 to 2.0.6
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:39 AM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6
I think we're going to
have to see the Global.CFG to figure out if there's a
misconfiguration. I certainly looks like your entire XINHEADER config
is duplicated.
Darin.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:34 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with
v 2.0.6
HEADER
Received: from
dns2.tcbinc.net [64.124.116.30] by bks.tcbinc.com
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A5E13540470; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:10:25 -0400
Received: from mail.tcbinc.net ([64.124.116.40])
by dns2.tcbinc.net (SMSSMTP 4.1.0.19) with SMTP id M2005041303105928414
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,
13 Apr 2005 03:10:59 -0400
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.tcbinc.net
(SMTP32) id AC601002507EA4CF6; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:10:59 -0400
Received: from ADS [64.124.116.10] by mail.tcbinc.net
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A6012507EA; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:10:57 -0400
SUBJECT: Virus Found
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-RBL-Warning: SNIFFERZERO: Message failed SNIFFERZERO: 0.
X-RBL-Warning: CMDSPACE: Space found in RCPT TO: command.
X-RBL-Warning: SPFPASS: SPF returned PASS for this E-mail.
X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail
client [8c200000].
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Total weight between 10 and 14.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[64.124.116.10]
X-Declude-Spoolname: DC601002507EA4CF6.SMD
X-RBL-Warning: SNIFFERZERO: Message failed SNIFFERZERO: 0.
X-RBL-Warning: SPFPASS: SPF returned PASS for this E-mail.
X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail
client [8c200000].
X-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain ADS has no MX or A records [0301].
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[64.124.116.10]
X-Declude-Spoolname: DC5E1035404704CAF.SMD
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 3.
X-RBL-Warning: Total weight: 3
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned & filtered by TCB [2.0.6] for SPAM
& virus.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SNIFFERZERO, SPFPASS, BADHEADERS, HELOBOGUS
X-Spam-Tests-Failed Weight: SNIFFERZERO [0], SPFPASS [0], BADHEADERS
[2], HELOBOGUS [1]
X-Spam-Time:03:10:29
X-Weight: 3
X-Mailfrom: fred.tcbinc.net
X-Note: Sent from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from Reverse DNS: ads.tcbinc.net ([64.124.116.10])
X-Hello: ADS
X-Note: Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:10:29 -0400
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 411698213
BODY:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed
Weight: SNIFFERZERO [0], CMDSPACE [8], SPFPASS [0], BADHEADERS [2],
WEIGHT10 [10]
X-Spam-Time:03:10:59
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 10
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned & filtered by Declude [2.0.6] for
SPAM & virus
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SNIFFERZERO, CMDSPACE, SPFPASS, BADHEADERS,
WEIGHT10
X-Weight: 10
X-Mailfrom: fred.tcbinc.net
X-Note: Sent from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from Reverse DNS: ads.tcbinc.net ([64.124.116.10])
X-Hello: ADS
X-Note: Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:10:59 -0400
Virus:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alert: Virus Found
Computer: DNS2
Date: 04/13/2005
Time: 03:10:54 AM
Severity: Critical
Source: Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition
--
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================
--
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================
--
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================
|
