|
I had
the same trouble with out shops sending pics through the EZ Share
software. I added them to our whitelist and they started coming through
just fine.
Rodney Bertsch
IT
Coordinator
Kirk NationaLease Co.
I have Kodak EZ Share that allows you to take
pictures with your digital camera and email them out...when I email them to
myself from another computer I never get them unless I tell it to send as
is..if I choose "Best for email" I wont get them. Other customers are telling
me they are not getting pictures either...
I am trying to figure out why..I have taken out
all my Imail rules and all .zip files from the virus config...and by the
way...it won't even send them to an account that I have
whitelisted..
Does anyone know where I could look to find out
why I am not getting them..they go to my yahoo.com account just fine..and I
have tried to decipher the log files with no luck.....
Could it be the virus program is deleting
them? I use FPROT..
I am sure there are more customers that are not
getting pictures that I have not heard from yet..
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247.5555
Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroads to a Cleaner
Internet"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:36
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log
Corruption
It's the same log format except that all the
messages for a specific email are grouped together. Well most of the time
they are grouped together.
It does make eyeball parsing of the log easier.
I load the logs into a database daily. With the
1.8x versions, I'll need to code around a new type of log corruption every
one to two months.
For the 3 days I was running 2.x, I had to code
around 4 new corruption issues.
Visually there is also more
corruption.
Odd things is that I never get log corruption
in message sniffer. So somebody is writing out logs that don't get
corrupt.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:16
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log
Corruption
There has always been corruption of the logs. What
seems to have changed here is that there is a new log format and the
programmed exceptions in DLanalyzer are no longer able to handle the types
of corruption as seamlessly as in the past.
I haven't seen the new
log format, but I would imagine that if they built it in a column format
and kept it to a single line, similar to Web logging standards, it should
be even easier to parse the data and correct for issues. If they
didn't keep to consistent columns, then this could be just as big of an
issue to parse as before and a lot of the exception rules would have to be
rewritten for the new format.
Matt
Goran Jovanovic
wrote:
Yesterday's report on my declude logfile showed
=...................................1........0.01%
02/28/2005..........................1........0.01%
FF156FB0094D05A.....................1........0.01%
I005................................1........0.01%
QCEA370970074D08A...................1........0.01%
SET.................................1........0.01%
SNIFFQCE053ABD0086D062..............1........0.01%
This is from
Total Messages Processed: 12,316
And loglevel set to HIGH and the size of the file is 122 MB
I am running 2.0.5
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Corruption
I had the opposite experience. Back at, oh, 1.7x I ran on LOGLEVEL
HIGH, and had lots of log corruption. I had to drop down to MID. The
increase in spam volume made it such that at MID, I had lots of log
corruption again.
With 2.x and the lines being written in a batch, I noticed an
immediate
drop in my disk usage and a huge drop in corrupted lines.
Andrew 8)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Corruption
Hi,
Yesterday was actually a good day (here a snippet):
TEST # FAILED Percentage
18:51:58................1........0.01%
SNIF02/28/2005..........1........0.01%
SPA02/28/2005...........1........0.01%
WEIG02/28/2005..........1........0.01%
Sure, I used to get reports that were "clean", but considering it only
happens a "few" times a day, I don't consider it a major issue and I
can
live with it.
Also I used to run in MID log level, but after 1.76 (or so), they
removed the test summary line form MID level, and I needed to switch
to
HIGH log level. It's entirely possible that the log corruption is not
really specific to 2.0x - but rather a secondary result because they
forded me to deal with tremendously large log files (vs. the old MID
log
files).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
--
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================
|
