Brute force works well for this particular virus, because it has so few
possibilities and doesn't use common enough attachment names for me to
consider it any risk for false positives:

#Jul-20-2004 AC broken BAGLE.AH and so forth
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="cat.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="Cool_MP3.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="Dog.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="Doll.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="Fish.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="Garry.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="MP3.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="Music_MP3.
BODY 0 CONTAINS filename="New_MP3_Player.

I put this in a JunkMail Pro filter file with a HOLD action.

Andrew 8)

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Fisher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Njabl test?


 Here are my NJABL results for June:

     Test                                        Count   Delete SPAM   Held
SPAM   Poss SPAM  Not SPAM
     CATCHALLMAILS                  273983        84.0%          3.2%
0.4%         12.3%
     NJABL-DUL                             12668        98.9%          1.1%
0.0%          0.0%
     NJABL-DYNABLOCK                88903        98.9%          1.0%
0.1%          0.0%
     NJABL-FORMMAIL-ALL                 10        60.0%          0.0%
0.0%         40.0%
     NJABL-FORMMAIL-LAST               10        60.0%          0.0%
0.0%         40.0%
     NJABL-HELO-DYNABLOCK            83        96.4%          3.6%
0.0%          0.0%
     NJABL-PROXIES-ALL              42501        99.7%          0.2%
0.0%          0.1%
     NJABL-PROXIES-LAST           42064        99.9%          0.1%
0.0%          0.0%
     NJABL-RELAYS-ALL                    353        87.3%          2.5%
1.4%          8.8%
     NJABL-RELAYS-LAST                  349        86.8%          2.6%
1.7%          8.9%
     NJABL-SOURCES                      6371        99.0%          0.7%
0.1%          0.2%
     NJABL-SOURCES-ALL              1285        99.5%          0.4%
0.0%          0.1%
     NJABL-SOURCES-LAST            1281        99.6%          0.3%
0.0%          0.1%


Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/20/04 09:54AM >>>
I notice the njabl test is not a "standard" test in the sample Declude
JunkMail config file:

# The following tests are commented out by 
  default because they are not commonly used
# NJABL  ip4r  dnsbl.njabl.org  127.0.0.2  5  0

Is this test worth the machine time doing the lookup?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to