|
Hello, All,
Can someone tell me why the below headers were
flagged as HELOBOGUS?
-
Received: from prxyecs2.xlecs.com [216.83.185.228]
by shkins.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A06C267000A2; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:11:56 -0400 Received: from msecs2.ecscenter.com (unverified) by prxyecs2.xlecs.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:09:11 -0400 Received: by msecs2.ext.usa.xl with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) id <20S8FADX>; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:01:50 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Someone" <Someone@xlprograms.com> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <someone@shkins.com> Cc: "'someoneelse@shkins.com'" <someoneelse@shkins.com> Subject: OJ Loss Run Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:13:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C42315.5E8311F0" X-Declude-Sender: someone@xlprograms.com [216.83.185.228] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned & filtered by Declude [1.75] for SPAM & viruses. X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination X-Note: Recipient(s): someone@shkins.com, someoneelse@shkins.com X-Note: Sent with HELO [prxyecs2.xlecs.com] from Reverse DNS [prxyecs2.ecscenter.com] X-Spam-Tests-Failed: HELOBOGUS, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, WEIGHT-HOLD [5] -
The helo doesn't look bogus to me unless something
has changed with that test.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
|
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why Was This E-Mail Marked As HELOB... Dan Geiser
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why Was This E-Mail Marked As ... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why Was This E-Mail Marked... Dan Geiser
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why Was This E-Mail Ma... R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Why Was This E-Mail Marked As ... Goran Jovanovic
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Why Was This E-Mail Marked As ... R. Scott Perry
