In this example, it is a bad combo. The NOLEGITCONTENT test will by default have a high FP rate. Per Scott, this test is intended not to punish failures, but to reward passes.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Fuhrmeister > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo Test . . . > > Scott, > > If I could assign a weight to a combination of tests . . . > > Specifically, if a message fails both SpamCop and NOLEGITCONTENT (meaning > it > has no legitimate content) it is almost certainly junk. > > SpamCop ID's more spam than anything else, but the flip side of that is > false positives. > > I guess I could add weight for NOLEGITCONTENT, but if we could "COMBO" > tests > . . . > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
