I have been running these tests for a while (as well as other that were producing little or not results), and they have been producing good results for me. However, my philosophy is different from some others on this list in that I like to test lots of IP4R and RHSBL databases and apply relatively low weights to many tests. I feel that you get a better balance and fewer FPs this way. The more tests that flag the source the more likely it is to be spam and the higher weight that gets applied to the message.
Also, since all DNS based tests get spanned simultaneously (rather than consecutively), there is no performance nor latency hit (unless one of the test sites is not responding - Scott, are you still planning to add a configurable time-out setting for the DNS based tests?). Anyway, here are the additional DNS based tests I've been using, in case you are interested in trying any of them out: * These IP4R test sites are listed on Scott's spam databases site, but without the test info: BORDERWORLD ip4r bl.borderworlds.dk * 2 0 BRAINERD ip4r blackholes.brainerd.net * 2 0 * These IP4R test sites are not yet listed on Scott's spam databases site: COMPLETEWHOIS ip4r bogons.dnsiplists.completewhois.com * 2 0 INTRUDERS ip4r intruders.docs.uu.se * 2 0 NJABL-DYNA ip4r dynablock.njabl.org * 2 0 REDHAWK ip4r access.redhawk.org * 2 0 SNARK ip4r rbl.snark.net * 2 0 SOLID ip4r dnsbl.solid.net * 2 0 SPAMRBL ip4r map.spam-rbl.com * 2 0 SPAMSOURCES ip4r spamsources.dnsbl.info * 2 0 * These RHSBL test sites are not yet listed on Scott's spam databases site: ISOC-RHSBL rhsbl dnsbl.isoc.bg * 2 0 ZONEEDIT rhsbl zebl.zoneedit.com * 2 0 Bill --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
