Unfortunately, there were only 176 responses, mostly from small to mid size setups. Therefore, the results were not reliable.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K. > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > Yeah, whatever happened to that, I poured my heart out there :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DLAnalyzer > Support > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > John, > > I remember you did a survey awhile back on problems with Imail/etc. Were > the results of that ever posted? > > Darrell > ------------------------------------------------ > Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for > Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com > > > John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: > > > For the majority, W2K3 is the way to go if you are able to. Ipswitch > does > > support running Imail on W2K3. > > > > There are some possible issues. > > > > 1. Running MS DSN service on W2K3 WITH Imail Anti-Spam DNS tests is a > > problem. > > > > 2. Some issues have been reported on the Imail list when the server > > processes a high volume of messages per day. Nothing seems to be > conclusive > > as far as I know to date, and from the posts, I have not seen a definite > > pattern. > > > > John Tolmachoff > > Engineer/Consultant/Owner > > eServices For You > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan > >> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:44 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > >> > >> So I haven't heard anything else back on this .. are you guys all > staying > >> away from Windows 2003 and Imail? I'm having a hard time trying to > justify > >> the risk of running new servers on 2k3 when 2k works just fine .. but > then > >> again, 2k3 seems more stable over time .... but not if Imail doesn't > >> support it well yet. > >> > >> grrrr > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Jonathan > >> > >> At 05:04 PM 12/4/2003, you wrote: > >> >The issues seem to appear at high volumes. > >> > > >> >Besides, I am more than willing to use those licenses for you. ;) > >> > > >> >John Tolmachoff > >> >Engineer/Consultant/Owner > >> >eServices For You > >> > > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan > >> > > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:43 PM > >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > >> > > > >> > > So, what's the scoop with current Imail 8, declude, sniffer, etc on > >> > > Windows > >> > > 2003 Server? We're thinking about moving it to some new iron > >> internally, > >> > > and Ive got some 2k3 licenses just burning a hole in my pocket. :) > >> > > > >> > > I heard some stability issues, saw some imail patches/etc .. things > >> stable > >> > > (and *robust*) now? Relatively high volumes of email .. > >> > > > >> > > Jonathan > >> > > > >> > > --- > >> > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > >> > > (http://www.declude.com)] > >> > > > >> > > --- > >> > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >> > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > >> > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > >> > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > >> > > >> >--- > >> >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > >> >(http://www.declude.com)] > >> > > >> >--- > >> >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >> >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > >> >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > >> >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > >> > >> --- > >> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > >> (http://www.declude.com)] > >> > >> --- > >> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > >> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > >> at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
