what we need is %TESTWITHWEIGHT% intead of %TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% so it will list test like ipnotinmx when they pass, and contribute to the total weight, instead of when they fail. you said i was coming in the next release, did you mean %TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% ?
Correct.
The problem with listing the tests that didn't fail is that end users just aren't going to understand. I think the only way they are going to understand is if the line is very elaborate, such as "X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Your E-mail failed the SPAMCOP test (+5) and REVDNS (+3) tests, and did not fail the NOLEGITCONTENT test (-3)...". But even that will start confusing the people who notice that some E-mail is failing the DSBL test -- what about E-mail that doesn't list DSBL in that header? Did it fail the test or not? *We* know that it did not, and that it just isn't listed because there is no weight associated with it. But I think that such a header could get very confusing.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
