IPBYPASS is great except for the 20 entry limitation. ATT, where many of my clients and myself have mailboxes that forward to my IMail server has 23 mail forwarders. Then add in the secondary MX's, etc. and I have to use multiple hops.
BTW, how do you intend to do "selective use of multiple hop scanning"? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matthew Bramble > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > didn't work for me me > > > That's why you should name it BONDEDSENDER-DYNA and why it doesn't > matter on my system. > > The trick here is that Declude will skip over the DNS-based tests on > anything beyond the first hop if the name has DUL or DYNA in it. > Someone else is using CBL-DYNA in order to keep that test > from throwing > FP's when the originating computer's IP address is on the > list, but used > a legit mail server to send the E-mail (instead of direct > delivery which > is the real issue). > > Scanning multiple hops seems to be mostly useful in places > where E-mail > is being forwarded, which only exposes the legit forwarding > machine. It > would be great if there was some other way to identify when a message > has been forwarded at the server level, and skip the last hop > when that > happenes. I kind of doubt that this would be possible. In the > mean-time, I am going to try IPBYPASSing the mail servers > that are known > to be forwarding to my server which should have the same effect as a > selective use of multiple hop scanning. > > Matt > > > > George Kulman wrote: > > >Matt, > > > >I do scan multiple hops. > > > >George > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >>Matthew Bramble > >>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:14 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > >>didn't work for me me > >> > >> > >>George, > >> > >>The suggestion by Andrew to rename the test BONDEDSENDER-DYNA would > >>definitely prevent it from scanning prior hops. I find this > >>test to be > >>useful as it is IP based and helps some very important E-mail > >>that tends > >>to have issues with several major RBL's. I haven't started > >>to scan on > >>multiple hops yet, so this doesn't come into play. > >> > >>Matt > >> > >> > >> > >>George Kulman wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Rob, > >>> > >>>Your backup and gateways should have IPBYPASS entries in the > >>> > >>> > >>GLOBAL.CFG. > >> > >> > >>>The BONDEDSENDER should be the originating Server and that > >>> > >>> > >>should be what's > >> > >> > >>>used for this test. > >>> > >>>I discontinued use within a few days since was letting spam > >>> > >>> > >>through with it > >> > >> > >>>and there were other ways to handle the valid mail. > >>> > >>>George > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >>>>Robert Grosshandler > >>>>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 6:38 PM > >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > >>>>didn't work for me me > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Negative weights on last hop only? > >>>> > >>>>How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a > >>>> > >>>> > >>backup mail > >> > >> > >>>>server)? > >>>> > >>>>Rob > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
