Combined with a weighting scheme it IS a worthwhile option. Currently, our option are "BOUNCE" (or now that ridiculous renamed version of the same action) - which means a FALSE positive will receive a notice and now has to contact us "manually" to address the false positive status.
Or we "DELETE" - and have nightmares about possible false positives. If Declude had a "VALIDATE" action (for emails that normally would BOUNCE or DELETE or HOLD), then those highly questionable mails would simply get an email (not any worse than using BOUNCE!) but at least the 0.1% of false positives could help themselves. The end-result for Declude users - we could much more worry-free "VALIDATE" emails that otherwise we would have to "pass". Less Spam would get through (due to higher threshold). False positives would not require the sys-admin to scan through "Held" mail - but instead the responsibility would be back in the lap of the sender who used an "implicated" mail server. Sorry - I really don't see why this is not a highly desirable feature and how this would create "spam" that the "WARN" or "BOUNCE" action don't generate already!? Best Regards Andy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
