|
Hello
Matthew,
Probably should have sent this off-list but I just want you to know how
much we appreciate the work you share with the group. Your filters have helped
reduce our spam significantly. I know how often we seem to complain when things
don't go right but how infrequently we share praise when someone is willing to
contribute their knowledge and expertise. Thanks from all of
us!!!
JR
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003
1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment
Fred,
If you don't mind a
short delay, I just finished the design on my new site in which I am planning
on placing this stuff. Given a little bit of additional time to populate
the pages in question and clean up the files, I'll have this ready to download
shortly. If you have the most recent version that I shared with the
group back on August 17th, it contains exceptions for the majority of FP's,
with the remaining things only being stragglers. Unfortunately this type
of filter is always going to have FP's, so there is a reasonable limit to how
much work goes into counterbalances.
If anyone has any more
counterbalances to suggest, now would be a wonderful time so that I can get
them into the file.
Thanks,
Matt
Frederick Samarelli
wrote:
Matt can I take a look at an updated version of you files.
Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Bramble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH test adjustment
I'll add these to the list that I maintain as well for both the
ANTIGIBBERISHSUB and ANTIGIBBERISH filters. You shouldn't need to add
these to the base filters though since the two letter string will trip
it without any assistance.
I took note of your "parts" suggestion as well, but haven't yet
determined how I would like to integrate this. I've got about a month
of hits archived though for easy searching, and I have seen some FP's on
this, but only from one place if I recall correctly. I wonder how
consistent the exception would be.
I'm going to put up a new file that contains these changes as well as
exceptions for "qos", "qmail" and a few updates for mail clients that
might send out such a string that isn't marked as base64.
Thanks,
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
I have added the following line to both GIBBERISH and ANTIGIBBERISH
tests:
BODY 0 CONTAINS QS-9000
BODY 0 CONTAINS QS9000
BODY 0 CONTAINS QS 9000
This is in response to messages that mention certifications, specifically
the Q_S_ (-)9000 automotive certification.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
--
===================================================
Matthew S. Bramble
President and Technical Coordinator
iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com
---------------------------------------------------
Office Phone: (518) 862-9042
Cellular: (518) 229-3375
Fax: (518) 862-9044
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===================================================
|
