On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:59 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 04:03:15 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 13:50 +0100, Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > > Package: linux-libc-dev > > > Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > When trying to install linux-libc-dev from experimental, dpkg shows the > > > following error message: > > > > > > dpkg: error processing > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.33-1~experimental.2_amd64.deb > > > (--unpack): > > > trying to overwrite '/usr/include/drm/nouveau_drm.h', which is also in > > > package libdrm-dev 0:2.4.18-2 > > > > It makes no sense to have the DRM headers split between libdrm-dev and > > linux-libc-dev. I'm happy to have libdrm-dev provide them all. What do > > you want to do? > > > I think we should go back to libdrm-dev installing the headers. I sent > a patch to dri-devel a few days ago that makes libdrm install its > headers in $(includedir)/libdrm so they don't conflict with the ones > installed by the kernel, waiting for some feedback on that…
I have committed changes to remove /usr/include/drm from linux-libc-dev. Please give libdrm-dev a versioned dependency on linux-libc-dev (>= 2.6.32-10). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
