I think this change (which works for the case reported) is more in line with what I'm trying to do. The problem with just using the max-advance property is that for fonts with a mixture of single- and double-column glyphs, there's no reliable way to get the width of a single-column glyph.
So I did the scan in checkXft to get a "good" estimate. (It's not perfect,
which is why I added the menu entry, etc).
diff -u -r1.314 fontutils.c
--- fontutils.c 2009/09/30 09:37:45 1.314
+++ fontutils.c 2009/10/11 18:43:18
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $XTermId: fontutils.c,v 1.314 2009/09/30 09:37:45 tom Exp $ */
+/* $XTermId: fontutils.c,v 1.315 2009/10/11 18:43:18 tom Exp $ */
/************************************************************
@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@
XGlyphInfo extents;
XftTextExtents32(XtDisplay(xw), xft, &c, 1, &extents);
- if (width < extents.width)
+ if (width < extents.width && extents.width <= data->map.max_width)
width = extents.width;
}
}
--
Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
