On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 14:53:19 +0200, nutzt...@web.de wrote: > So sorry for the priority "important", i was a little panic. > > Brice Goglin wrote: > > 2:1.6.3-1 *is* superior to 7, because of the 2: epoch prefix. > Okay, I understand, any epoch is higher than a bare version number. > But why this condition ">> 7", i don't see that version out there. > Is it obsolete? > xserver-common used to exist in sarge and earlier releases. The >> 7 condition is not strictly necessary, but it doesn't hurt anything.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
