On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:13 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:40:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 02:56 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote: > > >> Neither 6.11.0, built from your sources, nor 6.9.0 built from official > >> Debian's repo solves my problem. > >> > >> So, either I'm doing something wrong while building/installing > >> package, [...] > > > > grep -A2 radeon_drv /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > > > should verify this in each case. > > For self-built 6.9.0 (sources taken from pool on pl.debian.org mirror): > > $ grep -A2 radeon_drv /var/log/Xorg.0.log > (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so > (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > compiled for 1.6.1, module version = 4.3.0 > $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so > xserver-xorg-video-radeon: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so > $ dpkg -s xserver-xorg-video-radeon | grep Version > Version: 1:6.9.0-1+lenny4.0jp1 > > > Module version surprised me here, for other builds it's much more > predictable.
That's expected, we changed the module version scheme after 6.9.0. So it doesn't look like you did anything wrong testing the different driver versions. What else changed between the working and broken setups? xserver-xorg-core presumably, but maybe also the kernel? Are you using radeonfb for console? When you tested Option "DRI" "off", did you verify in the log file that direct rendering was indeed disabled? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
