Hi Chris, some questions about this commit: On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:52 +0000, Chris Lamb wrote: > commit 1d9453586fd1712791ac9cae6e1c27cff6815d2a > Author: Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> > Date: Thu Feb 5 00:04:24 2009 +0000 > > Build new libdrm-nouveau1 and libdrm-nouveau1-dbg packages. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> [...] > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index cd99512..4abda2a 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Vcs-Browser: > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/lib/drm-snapshot.git > Package: libdrm-dev > Section: libdevel > Architecture: any > -Depends: libdrm2 (= ${binary:Version}), libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) > [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386], ${misc:Depends} > +Depends: libdrm2 (= ${binary:Version}), libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) > [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386], libdrm-nouveau1 (= > ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 powerpc], > ${misc:Depends} > Description: Userspace interface to kernel rendering services (snapshot) -- > dev files > This library implements the userspace interface to the kernel DRM services. > DRM stands for "Direct Rendering Manager", which is the kernelspace portion
Any particular reason for restricting the dependency on -nouveau1 to these architectures? The package itself is arch:any. Do we want to also build it from libdrm for sid, and/or upload the nouveau driver to sid and squeeze? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
