On Sunday 08 June 2008 02:55:23 am Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 09:24:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I found those issues as well (there are 84 packages failing to build > > because of that). I discussed this briefly on #debian-x, but it's not > > clear yet if the X maintainers want to revert this change. > > > > I would personally prefer if this change was reverted and done after > > lenny. We don't really need 84 new RC bugs... > > I think I told you I'd revert it. But it would be nice if the mass bug > filing was done anyway, at important severity, so people have a chance > to fix that before it becomes RC when we drop the dependency again after > lenny. > > Anyway, a serious bug against xutils 1:7.3+11 is in order for now. > > Cheers, > Julien
OK, that sounds like a good plan. I'll file the bug against xutils and then start filing important severity bugs against the affected packages. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
