On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 19:16 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:46:54AM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote: > > On 10/17/07, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Because it's not clearly in the domain of Xorg. x11-input makes sense, > > > but then again, it's largely a system decision. OTOH, XKB can be used > > > in the console, not just in X (hence why it's namespaced input.xkb and > > > not input.x11.xkb or so), so that's why. > > > > Okay...so it's the domain of xkb? Even in that case, it seems there is > > a more appropriate place for it than hal. > > > > > Also, as Michel mentions, everything else is already in hal-info, so eh. > > > The latest release includes it, AIUI. > > > > Well, I really don't care where it comes from, as long as it's included. > > I think including it in our package until HAL gets it is probably the right > move. More package churn on the server is probably going to be a fact of > life for a while anyway. The reason I haven't really put much work in to > input hotplug is because I've been focused on getting output autodetection > in better shape. Once that's done, I'll get to this if no one else beats > me to it.
I think it would be better to listen to upstream and reassign this to hal-info... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer