Brice Goglin wrote: > Lior Kaplan wrote: >> This mail is sent to several people / mainlists. Please don't reply to >> all, but only to the relevant ones. >> >> I've recently finished the openoffice.org bug triage [1], and I'm >> looking for another candidate for similar triages. >> >> I've notices that your packages (a) has a (relatively) large number of >> bugs, or (b) a diversity of versions available without confirmation that >> the bug do exist in the latest one. >> >> If you're interested with getting help regarding this issue, please >> reply. I'd be happy to hear suggestions about the goals of the triage of >> your package. >> >> This mail is sent to the maintainers of these source packages: >> xorg >> xorg-server > > I am kind of sad to receive this mail since I just spent about 6 months > triaging our bugs :) See > http://ftp.es.debian.org/~ender/XSF_bugs/graphs/total-year.png
I guess this is a side effect of dealing with popular packages. You did a good job, and inspired others. > Unfortunately, most of our 850 remaining bugs (570 if I remove the > forwarded and wontfix ones) still occur. If you want to go ahead and fix > them, that would be nice too :) If I could fix the bugs myself, I would have joined the x strike force... But I thought about these goals for the bug triage: 1. Confirm all bugs to still be relevant for xorg version 7.2-5 and xorg-server version 1.3.0.0. 2. Close bugs which can't be confirmed and the submitter is not responsive (3 pings during 6 weeks time). Any other suggestions? Is what I'm offering OK by you? -- Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fingerprint: C644 D0B3 92F4 8FE4 4662 B541 1558 9445 99E8 1DA0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
