On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 16:24 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:02:23AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 08:47 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 23:52 +0200, Stéphane Rosi wrote: > > > > > > > >> After I run 'compiz --replace', gtk-window-decorator takes nearly 100% > > > >> of my cpu resources... > > > >> > > > > > > > > Some folks on the upstream compiz mailing list indicated this could > > > > happen if libdecoration0 is not the same version as the other compiz > > > > components. > > > > > > > > > > And we have a bug about our dependency on libdecoration0 not being > > > versioned: > > > #425463 compiz-plugins: Versioned depends on libdecoration > > > > Which implies the above can't be caused by an old libdecoration0 > > though... > > In fact, I'm experiencing the same problem (100% cpu from > gtk-window-decorator and no window borders) and I can guarantee that I > have the compiz suite all coming from unstable. > > BTW: this is when replacing metacity in my case.
It is when replacing metacity for me too. -- Steph
