> This comment is for "XAANoOffscreenPixmaps". I could say ok to adding > this option since I remember seeing improvement in Compiz when enabling > it on my Radeon. But, I don't know what its drawbacks are. > > About being nVidia specific, I was talking about the other line, > "AddARGBGLXVisuals", I have no idea what this option does.
Neither me, I just got them from the wiki. If you're concerned about yet-to-be-found drawbacks, we could make it optional via debconf then? > > On my Intel chipset, this line didn't break anything. > > So you think we should add nVidia crap to anybody's xorg.conf just > because there are some users of these evil non-free drivers out there ? :) Oh, not really. Screw nVidia. Beryl is only for faithful followers of the one true Intel card brand. :-) So which lines are we going to add, if any? I can test which lines can Intel do without, but not till monday. > Anyway, as long as nobody explained the drawbacks of these options (and > there are probably some, or they would be enabled by default), there is > no way this is going to be enabled by default, sorry. It is important to > keep the default config working on most boards, including the old ones > that might not support Compiz/Beryl at all for some reason (for instance > their video memory could not be large enough to store offscreenpixmaps?). Want a patch to make a debconf option for this? -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]