Hello all! I found a lot of documents that says that Xorg is better than Xfree86, but I realized that Etch/Xorg is significantly slower than Sarge/ Xfree86 on my computer. Is it normal? Shall I open a bug? I told this problem to a lot of user, but I can't find any accurate answer and I think this could be a problem that regards the inner structure on the X server (or the MGA driver?).
Computer: Pentium III 800 MHz 768 MB SDRAM (133 MHz) Matrox G450 32 MB AGP (fully supported by MGA driver) Tests with: - same computer - same resolution ([EMAIL PROTECTED], LCD native) - Gnome - X properly configured - DRI on *glxgears* - Debian 3.1 (Xfree86): 410 fps - Debian 4.0 Live (Xorg): 320 fps --> Xorg 25% slower than Xfree86 Other tests: *tuxracer* Debian Sarge: usable without problems Debian Etch: unusable (it's not fluent) *supertux* Debian Sarge: 59 fps (with opengl) Debian Etch: 48 fps (with opengl) -- Lurkos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
