On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:22:40PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > * X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > > Author: beatle > > Date: 2006-11-10 03:40:03 -0500 (Fri, 10 Nov 2006) > > New Revision: 3978 > > > > Added: > > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-dri-optimized-default > > Removed: > > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-utils > > Modified: > > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-dri-default > > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-dri-i386-i686 > > branches/experimental/mesa/debian/rules > > Log: > > Build Mesa utility programs (glxdemo, glxgears, glxheads, glxinfo) together > > with the DRI/GLX-enabled libGL. Don't build the utilities on CPU-optimized > > configurations. > [...] > > I forget to bring this up on the mailing list. I thought it was funny that > mesa-utils was apparently not built from the sources in the mesa source > package. > > While I'm aware that the utilities themselves don't really change that much, I > still think it would be useful to provide them by the mesa package. That way > they'll always be automatically up-to-date. It is also one package less > needing updates. > > Since the Debian XSF is the current maintainer of the mesa-utils package, I > wanted to ask on this list whether there were any objections to having mesa > provide the mesa-utils package.
This is actually something I've wanted for a long time, so no objection here. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
