On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:38:33AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:30:32PM +0000, David Nusinow wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:39:48PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:23:20PM +0000, David Nusinow wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > I like the patching system that's currently in place. > > > > > > > > Me too. I think the consensus is to keep it, although I think pushing > > > > the > > > > logic in to the quilt package is wise. > > > > > > Can you please explain the last part of this sentence? I do not > > > understand > > > what should be pushed into quilt. > > > > All the quilt-related stuff that's in xsfbs. Ideally we won't maintain it, > > but it'll be part of what's included in quilt instead. > > It looks like /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make is provided for this purpose, > It does not redirect quilt output into a log file, but this is not a > blocker for me. What should be pushed into it before we can use it?
Logging might be nice, but I'd like it to have a patch-audit target too. That's a valuable one. Aside from that though, nothing. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
