On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:08:22PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote: > On Thursday 20 April 2006 16:36, David L. Moreno wrote: > > File /usr/lib/libXrender.la is no longer provided by libxrender-dev > > package (See bug #362777). However, libkipi-dev is compiled with an > > old version of libxrender-dev, so it requires to have that file > > present when an application is linked to it. > [...] > > This should be fixed with a simple rebuild of the library.
> Thanks David, > Uploading a rebuilt binary package (libkexif0-dev) now, to close this bug. > Btw, you can also request a 'Binary-only non-maintainer upload' without > filing > a bug through [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Does this mean that other packages which are compiled with the old version > of libxrender-dev also require a binNMU? Yes, they do. > Is there any easy way to determine which packages require a rebuild fr > libxrender? libkexif0-dev didn't have any explicit depends on libxrender.. Unfortunately not. The candidate set of affected packages is "all packages which transitively build-depend on libxrender-dev or libxcursor-dev and ship .la files". A very irritating set to calculate... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
