On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:50:07AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 20:41 -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > > > > I have a question about general xorg7 version policy. Will you > > > generally be supplying the last "stable" release (7.0 at the moment, > > > right?) > > > to Debian unstable, or do you plan to upload xorg cvs? > > > > I haven't fully decided. Currently in experimental there's 7.0+, which is > > all of 7.0 plus the individual components that upstream has currently > > decided to release since (i810, libxkbfile, etc). I may put some CVS stuff > > in to unstable if it seems prudent. The ati driver looks like a good > > candidate right now for example due to benh's fixes, even if it requires an > > updated server. > > ati-1-0-branch doesn't. :)
Right, I keep forgetting about that. I need to just pull it. It'd be a lot easier if ben made tarball releases though :-) > > I'd like to stick with what upstream deems stable though for the most part. > > Indeed, I think in the long run we should track individual module > releases in sid and CVS snapshots as desirable in experimental, modulo > incompatibilities. Right, that's my basic plan. I'm not sure how closely I'll track CVS for experimental. My current plan is to do it in a goal-oriented fashion. The current goal being: provide Xgl, AIGLX, and Xephyr packages. Having something tangible to work towards in experimental will prevent us from just focusing on chasing upstream. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
