At Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:30:53 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > xutils has xmkmf, which seems to use imake, but the xutils package > doesn't make sure imake is available (one must install xutils-dev for > that), which is kind of confusing.
Hmm. xutils 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 in unstable does have both xmkmf and imake. xutils 1:1.0.1-2 in experimental doesn't have either, both are moved to xutils-dev. And xutils in experimental depends on xutils-dev. So there should be something really weird happening, if you have xmkmf, but not imake installed. The only problem I see is package descriptions mismatching with actual content. > [Maybe this is how people expect it to work, but I was confused, > trying to find out why Emacs didn't think X was installed, despite > having most X -dev packages installed...] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
