On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:04:42PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 20:51 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > 
> >    Currently what I've set up in svn and on my hard drive is to actually
> > continue bundling the xapps in to large source packages matching the
> > packages we have in 6.9 (xutils and xbase-clients). Ubuntu has them split
> > in to individual source packages, with metapackages built from the xorg
> > source package pulling them all together. I'm inclined to continue bundling
> > the apps for at least this release cycle, but I'm willing to unbundle them
> > Ubuntu-style if others think this is desireable. Does anyone have a
> > preference or anything?
> 
> Most of them probably won't see much independent development, so keeping
> them together might save some effort. This may not be true for some like
> xdriinfo, but they can always be moved to their own source packages if
> this turns out to be the case.

That was my sense too. Anything interesting can be split out and just
depended on.

> BTW, what's the plan for glxinfo and glxgears? Can't seem to find them
> anywhere in this.

To be honest, I don't know. I realized they were missing but haven't had a
chance to go hunting for them. Since they're not in the xorg app directory
in CVS I don't know where they're living at this point. They can be easily
bundled in though if I know their canonical upstream home.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to