On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:38:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 15:58 -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > > > I'm planning on informing the release team about this soon, but I'd like > > to hear comments from everyone here on this. We can feasibly provide > > transitional packages from the mesa source package, but I'd personally > > rather just do this cleanly and force everyone over to the new packages. > > Thoughts? > > Quite frankly, packages that (build-)depend on xlibmesa-gl exclusively > (as opposed to | libgl1) without good reason (if there is any...) at > this day and age are broken beyond repair, so I wouldn't worry about > this. :)
The problem is that sbuild will, as I understand it, only try the first item and then FTBFS if it can't find it. So anything build-depending on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1 will fail on the autobuilders when xlibmesa-gl goes away. Realistically we should just fix sbuild but that's not likely to happen any time soon. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
