Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:49:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs fixed in xterm 208-1.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 16:27:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 09:27:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EQ5vi-0002Yu-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:27:42 -0700
Received: from [172.18.45.6] (helo=davenant.greenend.org.uk ident=mail)
        by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
        (return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        id 1EQ5vg-0002fJ-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:27:40 +0100
Received: from ian by davenant.greenend.org.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 1EQ5vf-0002f0-00 (Debian); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:27:39 +0100
From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:27:39 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xterm -e no longer works with relative paths
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 19.34.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7

Part of my session arrangements include running this command:
  xterm -e .configs/rxprofile
from in my home directory (/u/ian in this case).
/u/ian/.configs/rxprofile exists and is an executable shell script.

This no longer works (!)

In
 strace -Ffot xterm -e .configs/rxprofile
I see this:

17686 execve("/usr/bin/X11/xterm", ["xterm", "-e", ".configs/rxprofile"], [/* 
38 vars */]) = 0
...
17686 fork()                            = 17687
...
17687 rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {SIG_DFL}, {SIG_IGN}, 8) = 0
17687 access("/u/ian/personal/linux/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
17687 access("/usr/local/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such 
file or directory)
17687 access("/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
17687 access("/usr/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
17687 access("/usr/local/sbin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such 
file or directory)
17687 access("/sbin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
17687 access("/usr/sbin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
17687 access("/usr/bin/X11/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file 
or directory)
17687 access("/usr/games/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file 
or directory)
17687 access("/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
17687 write(2, "No absolute path found for shell"..., 53) = 53

Which is quite insane enough, but it is followed by:

17687 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---

Just as icing on the cake, another deficiency in xterm means that I
don't see this message - the window just disappears again.


On woody's xterm I see this:

9915  execve("/usr/bin/X11/xterm", ["xterm", "-e", ".configs/rxprofile"], [/* 
43 vars */]) = 0
...
9915  fork()                            = 9916
...
9916  rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {SIG_DFL}, {SIG_IGN}, 8) = 0
9916  execve(".configs/rxprofile", [".configs/rxprofile"], [/* 43 vars */]) = 0

which is exactly as it should be.

Can we have the old sane behaviour back please ?


Ian.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318280-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 09:49:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 01:49:39 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cerrojo.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.12] helo=mail2.elmundo.es)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ewcbq-000636-Rp; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:49:39 -0800
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
        by mail2.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 698EF4614E; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:49:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
        id A2A3E17315; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:49:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 3AB3B17313; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:49:37 +0100 (CET)
From: David =?iso-8859-15?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing bugs fixed in xterm 208-1.
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:49:34 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.395205, version=0.10.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

--nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: 208-1

        David Nusinow forgot to run dpkg-buildpackage with -v option, in order 
to=
=20
close bugs from previous version. All these bugs were closed by xterm=20
204-0pre1 in experimental, and 208-1 in unstable.

        Best regards,


                Ender.
=2D-=20
Another C-3PO: E chu ta!
C-3PO: How rude!
                -- C-3PO (The Empire Strikes Back).
=2D-
Desarrollador de Debian
Debian developer

--nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDxOK/Ws/EhA1iABsRAgyXAJ9btqI83VKMODMnHZq2qpxfLWqHdgCg5nWf
DUWNgTZfS6O1ecWDlqKZA00=
=WvxL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to