Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:19:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333765: #333765 xterm -e no longer works with relative
paths
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 16:27:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 09:27:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQ5vi-0002Yu-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:27:42 -0700
Received: from [172.18.45.6] (helo=davenant.greenend.org.uk ident=mail)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
(return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1EQ5vg-0002fJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:27:40 +0100
Received: from ian by davenant.greenend.org.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1EQ5vf-0002f0-00 (Debian); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:27:39 +0100
From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:27:39 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xterm -e no longer works with relative paths
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 19.34.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
Part of my session arrangements include running this command:
xterm -e .configs/rxprofile
from in my home directory (/u/ian in this case).
/u/ian/.configs/rxprofile exists and is an executable shell script.
This no longer works (!)
In
strace -Ffot xterm -e .configs/rxprofile
I see this:
17686 execve("/usr/bin/X11/xterm", ["xterm", "-e", ".configs/rxprofile"], [/*
38 vars */]) = 0
...
17686 fork() = 17687
...
17687 rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {SIG_DFL}, {SIG_IGN}, 8) = 0
17687 access("/u/ian/personal/linux/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
17687 access("/usr/local/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
17687 access("/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
17687 access("/usr/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
17687 access("/usr/local/sbin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
17687 access("/sbin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
17687 access("/usr/sbin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
17687 access("/usr/bin/X11/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
17687 access("/usr/games/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
17687 access("/bin/.configs/rxprofile", X_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
17687 write(2, "No absolute path found for shell"..., 53) = 53
Which is quite insane enough, but it is followed by:
17687 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
Just as icing on the cake, another deficiency in xterm means that I
don't see this message - the window just disappears again.
On woody's xterm I see this:
9915 execve("/usr/bin/X11/xterm", ["xterm", "-e", ".configs/rxprofile"], [/*
43 vars */]) = 0
...
9915 fork() = 9916
...
9916 rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {SIG_DFL}, {SIG_IGN}, 8) = 0
9916 execve(".configs/rxprofile", [".configs/rxprofile"], [/* 43 vars */]) = 0
which is exactly as it should be.
Can we have the old sane behaviour back please ?
Ian.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333765-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 09:19:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 01:19:07 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kabuto.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.11] helo=mail.elmundo.es)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ewc8J-0004PQ-5q; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:19:07 -0800
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BE79334FCB; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:19:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id 9E0A917315; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:19:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3431417313; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:19:05 +0100 (CET)
From: David =?iso-8859-15?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#333765: #333765 xterm -e no longer works with relative paths
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:19:03 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart5688407.mhDPK4zxg4";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.373035, version=0.10.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
--nextPart5688407.mhDPK4zxg4
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Version: 204-0pre1
El jueves, 13 de octubre de 2005 23:20, Thomas Dickey escribi=F3:
> This is the same as 318280
All right, this should be fixed as of 204-0pre1 and later. Closing
bugs...
Regards,
Ender.
=2D-=20
=2D =BFCu=E1l es el futuro perfecto de AMAR?
=2D =A1Hijitos!
-- Susanita (Mafalda).
=2D-
Desarrollador de Debian
Debian developer
--nextPart5688407.mhDPK4zxg4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDxNuYWs/EhA1iABsRAh1EAJ0XYkcyiOjZ5fN5qes0uojMz23IhACfdsQ4
Bsq5PytH7MhlKO7toQFTbAU=
=gpzO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart5688407.mhDPK4zxg4--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
