[ Moving to pkg-mesa-devel, please follow up there only ] On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 11:12 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 05:30:52PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > I tried building from SVN: > > > > [...] > > mkdir -p debian/stamp/ && touch debian/stamp/target-gl-debian-debug > > dh_testdir > > chmod +x debian/shadowtree > > rm -f -rf build/gl-debian-debug-i386 > > debian/shadowtree build/gl-debian-debug-i386 > > Ah, sorry about that. > > I reworked a few parts of debian/rules and forgot to take the optimized > builds into account. > > It's fixed now.
Indeed, thanks. However, building the i8* drivers doesn't make much sense on powerpc, how about something like the attached patch? Also, I think the mach64 (and possibly r300) driver(s) should be in a separate package with a strong warning about the security risks. For mach64, the DRI support in the DDX won't be enabled by default in the foreseeable future anyway. > > > I just need to know if they work fine with the current X server in > > > unstable or if I need to wait for the 6.9 X server. > > > > FWIW, we generally try to preserve backwards compatibility, so they > > *should* work with the X server in sid. The r200 driver from Mesa CVS > > certainly works here, although I'm not using the DDX driver from > > xserver-xorg either. :) > > Ok, I'll try that on the hardware I have (i815 I think). The drivers don't seem to get linked against libdrm, so its symbols are unresolved. The r200 driver works fine with LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libdrm.so.1 though. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
